Comments on: Fun with Google Maps https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/ Rich Lafferty's OLD blog Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:35:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: ptomblin_lj https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1692 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:15:25 +0000 #comment-1692 Yeah, that’s why I didn’t post it myself.

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1691 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 18:24:36 +0000 #comment-1691 And wow, you guys got ripped off on resolution! I was going to have you point out your FBO.

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1690 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:56:39 +0000 #comment-1690 It does, and the marking below the horizontal “TAXI” doesn’t help any. I suspect it’s more there to make student pilots on short final for the taxiway go around than anything.

You can tell from the taxiway markings which runway is used primarily for training, and where the winds are usually coming from, though. :-)

]]>
By: ptomblin_lj https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1689 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:13:10 +0000 #comment-1689 Have you ever noticed that
T
A
X
I
looks kind of like a displaced threshold marking?

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1688 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:12:51 +0000 #comment-1688 Yeah, coverage is a bit odd. Look at Montreal: everything but downtown! I wonder if there was some commercial reason to cover waterways.

]]>
By: fweebles https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1687 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 07:02:07 +0000 #comment-1687 Um, there’s hi-res imagery of WIARTON. But not London, KW, or Guelph.

But: Aunt and Uncle’s house, heh.

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1686 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:55:42 +0000 #comment-1686 Yeah, that’s exactly it. There were convenient things, but there was no neighbourhood there.

]]>
By: fweebles https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1685 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:51:19 +0000 #comment-1685 I could understand that. That area seemed like…busy-ness without any use. Like, I don’t mind busy malls if they’re neat or fun or different, but it just seemed like Lincoln Fields was always A Big Bunch of People For No Good Reason.

And bah, I can only get low-res on K-W.

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1684 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:47:45 +0000 #comment-1684 Yep, Lincoln Fields. It was convenient, but I’m so glad to be away from there.

]]>
By: fweebles https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/04/04/fun-with-google-maps/comment-page-1/#comment-1683 Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:44:59 +0000 #comment-1683 *commenting at you here so he can hit both of you*

I can recognize that giant parking lot even from the air!
Lincoln Fields, n’est-ce pas?

*goes off to do his own googling*

]]>