Comments on: Greasemonkey script to fix SourceForge download links https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/ Rich Lafferty's OLD blog Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:03:14 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: dossy https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1609 Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:06:13 +0000 #comment-1609 But if you link directly to the mirror, I think SF’s download count stats won’t be accurate (may not be a big deal for you).

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1608 Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:03:17 +0000 #comment-1608 Interesting. That was the last place I was thinking of when I threw this together, though, because there you’re at least prepared to go through the additional steps. What gets me every time is when a project’s website has a link that looks like it downloads a package, and you copy the link (that ends in “.tar.gz” or “.rpm” even!) and paste it into a wget command on the remote box you’re working on, and you get an HTML page.

Flooterbuck‘s page is the example I kept testing on (see the download link), although it’s even worse when the website you’re looking at isn’t in the SourceForge domain.

]]>
By: crschmidt https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1607 Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:32:29 +0000 #comment-1607 Hm. I never noticed that when I first became a subscriber. I wonder if it’s new, or if I just missed it.

]]>
By: dossy https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1606 Fri, 18 Mar 2005 06:19:57 +0000 #comment-1606 Actually, you do — from the “Files” section on a SF project, if you’re a subscriber, it puts a little “[direct download]” hyperlink next to the file. It’s quite convenient for automating file pulls from SF projects, and the like.

]]>
By: crschmidt https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1605 Fri, 18 Mar 2005 03:19:53 +0000 #comment-1605 But the links aren’t written that way from the website, you still have to construct them yourself. It’s mostly good for batch downloading and things like that, according to their documetnation (unless they’ve changed something in the past 3 months)

]]>
By: dossy https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1604 Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:11:11 +0000 #comment-1604 If you’re a paid SourceForge subscriber, one of the “perks” is a direct-download link. I guess SourcePlease will be useful for those folks who aren’t subscribers, though. Cool!

]]>
By: brad https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1603 Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:00:22 +0000 #comment-1603 YES!!@!

]]>
By: zhixel https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1602 Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:15:28 +0000 #comment-1602 RAGH YES

]]>
By: citizenx https://www.lafferty.ca/2005/03/16/greasemonkey-script-to-fix-sourceforge-download-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1601 Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:15:07 +0000 #comment-1601 This is what lazy-as-virtue is about, sir. Well done.

]]>