Comments on: RSS: I tried. Really. https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/ Rich Lafferty's OLD blog Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:01:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-945 Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:01:23 +0000 #comment-945 Can you also see several days’ worth of one comic at once

No, but you can configure it (and I do) to not just link to the images but to download them locally, and keep N days worth around. (The “previous day” link on mine will work for nine days, IIRC.)

And isn’t re-publishing the strips on the Internet risky?

Shouldn’t be. In any case, mine is up there for me only anyhow; if they complain, I throw .htaccess up and it still works as expected.

I figure it’s no different than reading them at the SF Gate or Washington Post’s website but not actually buying the Gate or the Post. :-)

]]>
By: pne https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-944 Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:00:29 +0000 #comment-944 No, I haven’t heard about it yet.

Mine looks like this.

A page a day? Hmm. Can you also see several days’ worth of one comic at once, e.g. if you don’t watch for a while and want to see the story line?

(And isn’t re-publishing the strips on the Internet risky?)

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-943 Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:29:53 +0000 #comment-943 Have you seen dailystrips? Mine looks like this.

]]>
By: pne https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-942 Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:21:47 +0000 #comment-942 Works moderately well for cartoons, though that’s probably due to a large extent to the fact that

  1. they typically only update once a day, not a bunch of times like news sites, and
  2. you typically don’t watch that many different cartoon sites, so the interleaving isn’t that much of a problem.

On the other hand, then you have problems with feeds breaking or being taken offline since they don’t generate ad revenue. Which is understandable but slightly annoying once you’ve got used to getting your entire cartoon fix in one place.

(Not to mention wonky screen-scrapers that only fetch one panel of multi-panel [e.g. Sunday] cartoons, so you end up having to visit the site anyway…)

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-941 Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:12:36 +0000 #comment-941 YES.

]]>
By: fweebles https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-940 Fri, 30 Jan 2004 20:10:12 +0000 #comment-940 Macromedia Central is a flash-based distributed information console that you can use to write applications, and one of it’s spiffiest pre-made applications is a slashbox-like RSS reader. It’s pretty darn spiffy, even if Central isn’t ready for the primetime yet.

]]>
By: euqsam https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-939 Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:44:56 +0000 #comment-939 I tried a while back to use RSS. I found it was very useful for keeping track of 105 websites at once.

I read perhaps 12.

I dropped it.

]]>
By: fimmtiu https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-938 Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:19:42 +0000 #comment-938 Hearty agreement. I, too, cannot understand the RSS fuss.

]]>
By: brianenigma https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-937 Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:52:03 +0000 #comment-937 I would have to agree that the LiveJournal syndication really only seems to be useful for other people’s blogs. What I would really like to do is put some syndication headlines in a little SlashBox-type of thing in a sidebar, but until the LJ style system lets you use iframes or JavaScript, it becomes a little difficult to do this.

I am now using an RSS reader as much as my browser. I have not tried the one in Firebird (in fact, I didn’t even realize there was one), but that screenshot seems like it is missing something. I see sites, headlines, and the rendered pages, but not the content-within-RSS stuff. Personally, I use NewNewsWire (screenshot of normal view, screenshot of inline view that some like, but I find annoying). Clicking on a title in the upper-right quadrant (or arrowing to it…it is pretty keyboard friendly) displays the RSS feed content. Double clicking on a title in the upper-right quadrant (or hitting enter after arrowing to it) launches the specific article’s URL in my browser. Double clicking on the name of the site in the left quadrant (or via keyboarding) opens the site’s front page in my browser.

Yes, I do miss out on several things when looking at the RSS overview like this. Many sites have full articles with links (and sometimes even images) published in their RSS feeds. Many others print the first few sentences. Some simply have article titles, so you have to click over to the site anyway. The RSS specification has fields for things like the number of comments and the URL for viewing all comments or posting a comment. Unfortunately, few sites publish this data and even fewer readers will display it if it’s there.

Overall, I am really happy with this particular newsreader (I am sure there are others with a similar featureset/interface for Unix, Windows, etc). My happiness with using the feeds out there with a good reader ranges from “mildly annoyed” to “extremely happy.”

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2004/01/30/rss-i-tried-really/comment-page-1/#comment-936 Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:13:13 +0000 #comment-936 Ooh! I’ll have to play with it later.

The second thing you describe sounds like mod_roaming, which I loved in Netscape 4.

]]>