Comments on: Attn lazyweb: https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/ Rich Lafferty's OLD blog Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:28:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.2 By: anonymous https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-730 Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:28:18 +0000 #comment-730 http://www.advogato.org/ and especially the ‘recentlog’ at
http://www.advogato.org/recentlog.html

Focus is generally on open source software, but postings cover all sorts of different things.

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-729 Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:48:23 +0000 #comment-729 Yeah, that’s basically what I’m figuring for articles/posts.

The more I think about it the more I think I want sweetcode but successful, and I think sweetcode failed in a few ways:

  • only one person posting
  • the “interesting” bar set too high
  • no place for users to talk about the software

Strongly considering doing it now.

]]>
By: brianenigma https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-728 Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:12:49 +0000 #comment-728 I would certainly read it and contribute with comments. I am not sure I would contribute with articles our source posts unless “articles” consisted of not much more than “Hey, you all should check out the latest Freevo. It lets you play MAME ROMs now.”

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-727 Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:12:16 +0000 #comment-727 No, onna web!

]]>
By: Rich https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-726 Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:10:53 +0000 #comment-726 No, it needs to be bloglike. Something you can go and look at every day to see what new software someone’s written about today.

]]>
By: flipzagging https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-725 Fri, 24 Oct 2003 05:41:39 +0000 #comment-725 Aren’t you describing a LUG mailing list? Or what they used to be, before there was Google or Slashdot or Freshmeat or other sources of robo-news?

I miss those sorts of groups — there was a sense of a shared project.

I think it could be great as long as you somehow ensure everyone on the list has a similar enough world-view and definition of ‘interesting’. Invitation-only?

]]>
By: frobisher https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-724 Fri, 24 Oct 2003 04:06:34 +0000 #comment-724 How about a wiki seeded with data from those sites?

]]>
By: peculiah https://www.lafferty.ca/2003/10/24/attn-lazyweb/comment-page-1/#comment-723 Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:12:15 +0000 #comment-723 New Belle and Sebastian = tops

]]>